You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Internet-Based Conversational Engagement Clinical Trial (I-CONECT) in Socially Isolated Adults 75+ Years Old: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol and COVID-19 Related Study Modifications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2021.714813 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kexin Yu, Katherine Wild, Kathleen Potempa, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Peter A. Lichtenberg, Laura M. Struble, Patrick Pruitt, Elena L. Alfaro, Jacob Lindsley, Mattie MacDonald, Jeffrey A. Kaye, Lisa C. Silbert, Hiroko H. Dodge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,043,340
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#91
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,707
of 426,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#16
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.