You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Digital Health, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trisha Greenhalgh, Rebecca Rosen, Sara E. Shaw, Richard Byng, Stuart Faulkner, Teresa Finlay, Emily Grundy, Laiba Husain, Gemma Hughes, Claudia Leone, Lucy Moore, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Catherine Pope, Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt, Alexander Rushforth, Joseph Wherton, Sietse Wieringa, Gary W. Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 43 | 34% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Philippines | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 25% |
| Scientists | 20 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#314,900
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#10
of 866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,356
of 439,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#3
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.