↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of physics-based deformable registration methods for image-guided neurosurgery

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Digital Health, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of physics-based deformable registration methods for image-guided neurosurgery
Published in
Frontiers in Digital Health, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1283726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikos Chrisochoides, Yixun Liu, Fotis Drakopoulos, Andriy Kot, Panos Foteinos, Christos Tsolakis, Emmanuel Billias, Olivier Clatz, Nicholas Ayache, Andrey Fedorov, Alex Golby, Peter Black, Ron Kikinis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#20,305,870
of 24,965,047 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Health
#668
of 767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,004
of 177,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Health
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,965,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.