↓ Skip to main content

On Digital Therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Digital Humanities, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On Digital Therapeutics
Published in
Frontiers in Digital Humanities, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fdigh.2015.00006
Authors

Enrico Capobianco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Linguistics 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,668,780
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Digital Humanities
#55
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,850
of 284,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Digital Humanities
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.