You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the Differences of Gridding Techniques for Digital Elevation Models Generation and Their Influence on the Modeling of Stony Debris Flows Routing: A Case Study From Rovina di Cancia Basin (North-Eastern Italian Alps)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2018.00089 |
| Authors |
Mauro Boreggio, Martino Bernard, Carlo Gregoretti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,276,005
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,202
of 4,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,303
of 352,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#48
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.