You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perspectives on Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Simulation for Flood Modeling in the Absence of a High-Accuracy Open Access Global DEM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2018.00233 |
| Authors |
Laurence Hawker, Paul Bates, Jeffrey Neal, Jonathan Rougier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 91 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 68 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 106 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,055,358
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,141
of 4,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,314
of 435,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#32
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.