↓ Skip to main content

How Continuous Are the “Relict” Landscapes of Southeastern Tibet?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Continuous Are the “Relict” Landscapes of Southeastern Tibet?
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.587597
Authors

Matthew Fox, Andrew Carter, Jin-Gen Dai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 47%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,937,329
of 23,862,493 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#561
of 5,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,979
of 417,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#31
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,493 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.