You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chronological Assessment of the Balta Alba Kurgan Loess-Paleosol Section (Romania) – A Comparative Study on Different Dating Methods for a Robust and Precise Age Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2020.598448 |
| Authors |
Stephanie Scheidt, Sonja Berg, Ulrich Hambach, Nicole Klasen, Stephan Pötter, Alexander Stolz, Daniel Veres, Christian Zeeden, Dominik Brill, Helmut Brückner, Stephanie Kusch, Christian Laag, Frank Lehmkuhl, Martin Melles, Florian Monnens, Lukas Oppermann, Janet Rethemeyer, Janina J. Nett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 57% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 42% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,862,582
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#750
of 4,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,898
of 537,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#52
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.