You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
3D Linked Subduction, Dynamic Rupture, Tsunami, and Inundation Modeling: Dynamic Effects of Supershear and Tsunami Earthquakes, Hypocenter Location, and Shallow Fault Slip
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/feart.2021.626844 |
Authors |
Sara Aniko Wirp, Alice-Agnes Gabriel, Maximilian Schmeller, Elizabeth H. Madden, Iris van Zelst, Lukas Krenz, Ylona van Dinther, Leonhard Rannabauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 13% |
United States | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
Scientists | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 50% |
Engineering | 2 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,668,876
of 25,269,846 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#515
of 6,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,809
of 436,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#34
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,269,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.