↓ Skip to main content

Correcting for Systematic Underestimation of Topographic Glacier Aerodynamic Roughness Values From Hintereisferner, Austria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correcting for Systematic Underestimation of Topographic Glacier Aerodynamic Roughness Values From Hintereisferner, Austria
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.691195
Authors

Joshua R. Chambers, Mark W. Smith, Thomas Smith, Rudolf Sailer, Duncan J. Quincey, Jonathan L. Carrivick, Lindsey Nicholson, Jordan Mertes, Ivana Stiperski, Mike R. James

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 35%
Researcher 5 22%
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 35%
Environmental Science 5 22%
Unspecified 3 13%
Computer Science 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,696,011
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#532
of 5,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,094
of 440,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#40
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,972 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.