↓ Skip to main content

A Comparative Study on Microscopic Characteristics of Volcanic Reservoirs in the Carboniferous Kalagang and Haerjiawu Formations in the Santanghu Basin, China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparative Study on Microscopic Characteristics of Volcanic Reservoirs in the Carboniferous Kalagang and Haerjiawu Formations in the Santanghu Basin, China
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.735703
Authors

Weiming Wang, Weihao La, Tanguang Fan, Xiongfei Xu, Yingnan Liu, Qixia Lv

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,436
of 4,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,610
of 433,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#138
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,869 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.