↓ Skip to main content

Spatial–temporal variations in natural disasters during the Ming and Qing dynasties (1368–1911 AD) in the ancient Huizhou region, eastern China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial–temporal variations in natural disasters during the Ming and Qing dynasties (1368–1911 AD) in the ancient Huizhou region, eastern China
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.960113
Authors

Shuguang Lu, Li Wu, Xianfu Cheng, Guanglai Xu, Fei Shen, Chenchen Li, Xiaosi Hu, Baodong Yang, Hongmei Zhang, Xiaoxue Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#20,812,371
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#3,204
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,787
of 432,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#254
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.