You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender Performance Gaps Across Different Assessment Methods and the Underlying Mechanisms: The Case of Incoming Preparation and Test Anxiety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Education, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2019.00107 |
| Authors |
Shima Salehi, Sehoya Cotner, Samira M. Azarin, Erin E. Carlson, Michelle Driessen, Vivian E. Ferry, William Harcombe, Suzanne McGaugh, Deena Wassenberg, Azariah Yonas, Cissy J. Ballen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 37 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,606,056
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Education
#105
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,458
of 346,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Education
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.