↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the effectiveness of online learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic period

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Education, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of the effectiveness of online learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic period
Published in
Frontiers in Education, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2023.1334153
Authors

Wentao Meng, Lei Yu, Chen Liu, Nengchao Pan, Xiawen Pang, Yunyun Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Lecturer 2 29%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Chemistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#22,606,291
of 25,217,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Education
#1,939
of 3,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,429
of 165,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Education
#80
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,217,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,238 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.