↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Aspects of Neuron-Oligodendrocyte-Astrocyte Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Aspects of Neuron-Oligodendrocyte-Astrocyte Interactions
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2013.00054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana I. Amaral, Tore W. Meisingset, Mark R. Kotter, Ursula Sonnewald

Abstract

Whereas astrocytes have been in the limelight of scientific interest in brain energy metabolism for a while, oligodendrocytes are still waiting for a place on the metabolic stage. We propose to term the interaction of oligodendrocytes with astrocytes and neurons: NOA (neuron-oligodendrocyte-astrocyte) interactions. One of the reasons to find out more about metabolic interactions between oligodendrocytes, neurons, and astrocytes is to establish markers of healthy oligodendrocyte metabolism that could be used for the diagnosis and assessment of white matter disease. The vesicular release of glutamate in the white matter has received considerable attention in the past. Oligodendrocyte lineage cells express glutamate receptors and glutamate toxicity has been implicated in diseases affecting oligodendrocytes such as hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, inflammatory diseases and trauma. As oligodendrocyte precursor cells vividly react to injury it is also important to establish whether cells recruited into damaged areas are able to regenerate lost myelin sheaths or whether astrocytic scarring occurs. It is therefore important to consider metabolic aspects of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes separately. The present review summarizes the limited evidence available on metabolic cycles in oligodendrocytes and so hopes to stimulate further research interests in this important field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 32%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 35%
Neuroscience 34 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#6,741
of 13,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,964
of 289,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#114
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.