↓ Skip to main content

The Emerging Role of Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling in Cancer Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Emerging Role of Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling in Cancer Stem Cells
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2014.00010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta Malaguarnera, Antonino Belfiore

Abstract

Cancer cells frequently exploit the IGF signaling, a fundamental pathway mediating development, cell growth, and survival. As a consequence, several components of the IGF signaling are deregulated in cancer and sustain cancer progression. However, specific targeting of IGF-IR in humans has resulted efficacious only in small subsets of cancers, making researches wondering whether IGF system targeting is still worth pursuing in the clinical setting. Although no definite answer is yet available, it has become increasingly clear that other components of the IGF signaling pathway, such as IR-A, may substitute for the lack of IGF-IR, and induce cancer resistance and/or clonal selection. Moreover, accumulating evidence now indicates that IGF signaling is a central player in the induction/maintenance of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell stemness, two strictly related programs, which play a key role in metastatic spread and resistance to cancer treatments. Here we review the evidences indicating that IGF signaling enhances the expression of transcription factors implicated in the EMT program and has extensive cross-talk with specific pathways involved in cell pluripotency and stemness maintenance. In turn, EMT and cell stemness activate positive feed-back mechanisms causing up-regulation of various IGF signaling components. These findings may have novel translational implications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 27%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#23,084,818
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#8,493
of 13,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,601
of 321,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.