↓ Skip to main content

Biophysical Detection of Diversity and Bias in GPCR Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biophysical Detection of Diversity and Bias in GPCR Function
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2014.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Werner C. Jaeger, Stephen P. Armstrong, Stephen J. Hill, Kevin D. G. Pfleger

Abstract

Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) function in complexes with a range of molecules and proteins including ligands, G proteins, arrestins, ubiquitin, and other receptors. Elements of these complexes may interact constitutively or dynamically, dependent upon factors such as ligand binding, phosphorylation, and dephosphorylation. They may also be allosterically modulated by other proteins in a manner that changes temporally and spatially within the cell. Elucidating how these complexes function has been greatly enhanced by biophysical technologies that are able to monitor proximity and/or binding, often in real time and in live cells. These include resonance energy transfer approaches such as bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Furthermore, the use of fluorescent ligands has enabled novel insights into allosteric interactions between GPCRs. Consequently, biophysical approaches are helping to unlock the amazing diversity and bias in G protein-coupled receptor signaling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 63 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 25%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 14%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,747,916
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#4,392
of 13,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,079
of 235,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,058 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.