↓ Skip to main content

Targeting the IGF-1R: The Tale of the Tortoise and the Hare

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting the IGF-1R: The Tale of the Tortoise and the Hare
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2015.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitrin Crudden, Ada Girnita, Leonard Girnita

Abstract

The insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-1R) plays a key role in the development and maintenance of cancer. Since the first links between growth factor receptors and oncogenes were noted over three decades ago, targeting the IGF-1R has been of great interest. This review follows the progress from inception through intense pharmaceutical development, disappointing clinical trials and recent updates to the signaling paradigm. In light of major developments in signaling understanding and activation complexities, we examine reasons for failure of first line targeting approaches. Recent findings include the fact that the IGF-1R can signal in the absence of the ligand, in the absence of kinase activity, and utilizes components of the GPCR system. With recognition of the unappreciated complexities that this first wave of targeting approaches encountered, we advocate re-recognition of IGF-1R as a valid target for cancer treatment and look to future directions, where both research and pharmaceutical strengths can lend themselves to finally unearthing anti-IGF-1R potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 29%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Chemistry 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,551,340
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#2,868
of 13,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,778
of 280,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#20
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.