↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Common Genetic Risk Factors of Diabetic Neuropathies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying Common Genetic Risk Factors of Diabetic Neuropathies
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2015.00088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ini-Isabée Witzel, Herbert F. Jelinek, Kinda Khalaf, Sungmun Lee, Ahsan H. Khandoker, Habiba Alsafar

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a global public health problem of epidemic proportions, with 60-70% of affected individuals suffering from associated neurovascular complications that act on multiple organ systems. The most common and clinically significant neuropathies of T2DM include uremic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, and cardiac autonomic neuropathy. These conditions seriously impact an individual's quality of life and significantly increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Although advances in gene sequencing technologies have identified several genetic variants that may regulate the development and progression of T2DM, little is known about whether or not the variants are involved in disease progression and how these genetic variants are associated with diabetic neuropathy specifically. Significant missing heritability data and complex disease etiologies remain to be explained. This article is the first to provide a review of the genetic risk variants implicated in the diabetic neuropathies and to highlight potential commonalities. We thereby aim to contribute to the creation of a genetic-metabolic model that will help to elucidate the cause of diabetic neuropathies, evaluate a patient's risk profile, and ultimately facilitate preventative and targeted treatment for the individual.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,235,172
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#5,124
of 13,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,154
of 280,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#31
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,004 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.