↓ Skip to main content

Octreotide Does Not Inhibit Proliferation in Five Neuroendocrine Tumor Cell Lines

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Octreotide Does Not Inhibit Proliferation in Five Neuroendocrine Tumor Cell Lines
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2018.00146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Exner, Vikas Prasad, Bertram Wiedenmann, Carsten Grötzinger

Abstract

Somatostatin analogs (SSA) are well-established antisecretory drugs in functionally active neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Two placebo-controlled trials have recently demonstrated significant improvement of progression-free survival under SSA treatment. Furthermore, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) overexpression in NET has also been utilized for diagnostic imaging and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). However, PRRT in NET is associated mostly with partial and minor remission, while other radionuclide therapies reach complete remissions in up to 75% of cases. This study assessed a potential radiosensitizing effect of SSA treatment in five established NET cell line models: BON, QGP-1, LCC-18, H727, and UMC-11. Irradiation was found to significantly inhibit proliferation, while no additional effect by octreotide treatment was observed. Intriguingly, no impact of SSA treatment alone was found in any of these NET cell lines when systematically analyzing cell viability, proliferation, and cell cycle distribution. Investigation of the causes for this octreotide resistance led to demonstration of low octreotide binding and scarce SSTR, specifically SSTR2 expression as compared to levels found in human NETs. The resistance toward SSA treatment in viability and proliferation assays could not be overcome by re-expression of SSTR2 in two of the cell lines. These results provide systematic evidence for a lack of authentic, tumor-like SSTR expression, and function in five frequently used NET cell line models and point to the need for more physiologic tumor model systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 13%
Chemistry 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#5,759
of 13,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,479
of 343,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#109
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.