You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2018.00373 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Pilz, Winfried März, Kevin D. Cashman, Mairead E. Kiely, Susan J. Whiting, Michael F. Holick, William B. Grant, Pawel Pludowski, Mickael Hiligsmann, Christian Trummer, Verena Schwetz, Elisabeth Lerchbaum, Marlene Pandis, Andreas Tomaschitz, Martin R. Grübler, Martin Gaksch, Nicolas Verheyen, Bruce W. Hollis, Lars Rejnmark, Spyridon N. Karras, Andreas Hahn, Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari, Jörg Reichrath, Rolf Jorde, Ibrahim Elmadfa, Reinhold Vieth, Robert Scragg, Mona S. Calvo, Natasja M. van Schoor, Roger Bouillon, Paul Lips, Suvi T. Itkonen, Adrian R. Martineau, Christel Lamberg-Allardt, Armin Zittermann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Finland | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 484 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 11% |
| Researcher | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 73 | 15% |
| Unknown | 176 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 68 | 14% |
| Unknown | 203 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#254,712
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#64
of 13,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,095
of 324,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.