↓ Skip to main content

No Guts, No Loss: Toward the Ideal Treatment for Obesity in the Twenty-First Century

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 13,257)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
92 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No Guts, No Loss: Toward the Ideal Treatment for Obesity in the Twenty-First Century
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2018.00442
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C. D. Hope, Tricia M. M. Tan, Stephen R. Bloom

Abstract

Over the last century, our knowledge of the processes which control appetite and weight regulation has developed significantly. The understanding of where gut hormones fit into the control of energy homeostasis in addition to the rapid advancement of pharmacotherapeutics has paved the way for the development of novel gut hormone analogs to target weight loss. Currently, bariatric surgery remains the most efficacious treatment for obesity. The emergence of gut hormone analogs may provide a useful non-surgical addition to the armamentarium in treating obesity. Simply targeting single gut hormone pathways may be insufficiently efficacious, and combination/multiple-agonist approaches may be necessary to obtain the results required for clear clinical impact.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 24 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 736. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#27,485
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#4
of 13,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#517
of 341,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#1
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,257 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.