↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Fertility Preservation for Child and Adolescent Cancer Patients in Asian Countries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Fertility Preservation for Child and Adolescent Cancer Patients in Asian Countries
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2020
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2020.00241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seido Takae, Jung Ryeol Lee, Nalini Mahajan, Budi Wiweko, Nares Sukcharoen, Virgilio Novero, Antoinette Catherine Anazodo, Debra Gook, Chii-Ruey Tzeng, Alexander Kenneth Doo, Wen Li, Chau Thi Minh Le, Wen Di, Ri-Cheng Chian, Seok Hyun Kim, Nao Suzuki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#23,214,800
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#8,497
of 13,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,597
of 410,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#154
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.