You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perspective of the GEMSTONE Consortium on Current and Future Approaches to Functional Validation for Skeletal Genetic Disease Using Cellular, Molecular and Animal-Modeling Techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2021.731217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Rauner, Ines Foessl, Melissa M. Formosa, Erika Kague, Vid Prijatelj, Nerea Alonso Lopez, Bodhisattwa Banerjee, Dylan Bergen, Björn Busse, Ângelo Calado, Eleni Douni, Yankel Gabet, Natalia García Giralt, Daniel Grinberg, Nika M. Lovsin, Xavier Nogues Solan, Barbara Ostanek, Nathan J. Pavlos, Fernando Rivadeneira, Ivan Soldatovic, Jeroen van de Peppel, Bram van der Eerden, Wim van Hul, Susanna Balcells, Janja Marc, Sjur Reppe, Kent Søe, David Karasik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Denmark | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,264,044
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#1,549
of 13,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,089
of 516,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#75
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.