↓ Skip to main content

mDIXON-Quant for differentiation of renal damage degree in patients with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
mDIXON-Quant for differentiation of renal damage degree in patients with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2023.1187042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Wang, Ye Ju, Qi An, Liangjie Lin, Ai Lian Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#5,293
of 13,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,107
of 361,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#209
of 749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.