↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Decoding checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events, volume II

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Decoding checkpoint inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events, volume II
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2023.1317220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah L. Burnett, Megan B. Barnet, Ania Moxon, Venessa Tsang, Katherine Samaras

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,636,662
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#5,418
of 13,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,680
of 364,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#207
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.