You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mulberry and Hippophae-based solid beverage promotes weight loss in rats by antagonizing white adipose tissue PPARγ and FGFR1 signaling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2024.1344262 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao-Ting Zhou, An-Qi Zhu, Xiao-Min Li, Ling-Yue Sun, Jian-Gang Yan, Nin Luo, Shi-Sheng Chen, Zebo Huang, Xin-Liang Mao, Kun-Ping Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,997,104
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#4,488
of 13,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,862
of 289,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#90
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.