You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multi-omics subgroups associated with glycaemic deterioration in type 2 diabetes: an IMI-RHAPSODY Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2024.1350796 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shiying Li, Iulian Dragan, Van Du T Tran, Chun Ho Fung, Dmitry Kuznetsov, Michael K Hansen, Joline W J Beulens, Leen M 't Hart, Roderick C Slieker, Louise A Donnelly, Mathias J Gerl, Christian Klose, Florence Mehl, Kai Simons, Petra J M Elders, Ewan R Pearson, Guy A Rutter, Mark Ibberson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 67% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,330,916
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,986
of 13,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,322
of 336,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#89
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.