↓ Skip to main content

Comparative mathematical modeling of causal association between metal exposure and development of chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative mathematical modeling of causal association between metal exposure and development of chronic kidney disease
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2024.1362085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miaoling Wu, Weiming Hou, Ruonan Qin, Gang Wang, Da Sun, Ye Geng, Yinke Du

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,695,829
of 25,942,066 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#5,432
of 13,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,316
of 214,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#48
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,942,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.