You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Different Biomass Pretreatment Techniques and Their Impact on Chemistry and Structure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Energy Research, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenrg.2014.00062 |
| Authors |
Seema Singh, Gang Cheng, Noppadon Sathitsuksanoh, Dong Wu, Patanjali Varanasi, Anthe George, Venkatesh Balan, Xiadi Gao, Rajeev Kumar, Bruce E. Dale, Charles E. Wyman, Blake A. Simmons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 68 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 40 | 15% |
| Engineering | 31 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Unknown | 88 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,928,506
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#325
of 3,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,704
of 352,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.