↓ Skip to main content

Design and Performance Analysis of Blades Based on the Equal–Variable Circulation Method

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Energy Research, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and Performance Analysis of Blades Based on the Equal–Variable Circulation Method
Published in
Frontiers in Energy Research, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2021.790622
Authors

D. Liang, C. Song, S. Liang, S. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#769
of 3,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,876
of 510,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#84
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.