You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbiome Analysis Across a Natural Copper Gradient at a Proposed Northern Canadian Mine Site
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2015.00084 |
| Authors |
Thea Van Rossum, Melanie M. Pylatuk, Heather L. Osachoff, Emma J. Griffiths, Raymond Lo, May Quach, Richard Palmer, Nicola Lower, Fiona S. L. Brinkman, Christopher J. Kennedy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,078,546
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#812
of 4,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,049
of 405,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.