You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus Modeling for HTS Assays Using In silico Descriptors Calculates the Best Balanced Accuracy in Tox21 Challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00002 |
| Authors |
Ahmed Abdelaziz, Hilde Spahn-Langguth, Karl-Werner Schramm, Igor V. Tetko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 26% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 15 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,246,461
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#894
of 3,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,228
of 397,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,248 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.