You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glyphosate: Too Much of a Good Thing?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00028 |
| Authors |
Marek Cuhra, Thomas Bøhn, Petr Cuhra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| France | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 83% |
| Scientists | 6 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 168 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#588,399
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#55
of 4,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,681
of 307,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.