You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Environmental Impacts of the Deep-Water Oil and Gas Industry: A Review to Guide Management Strategies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00058 |
Authors |
Erik E. Cordes, Daniel O. B. Jones, Thomas A. Schlacher, Diva J. Amon, Angelo F. Bernardino, Sandra Brooke, Robert Carney, Danielle M. DeLeo, Katherine M. Dunlop, Elva G. Escobar-Briones, Andrew R. Gates, Luciana Génio, Judith Gobin, Lea-Anne Henry, Santiago Herrera, Sarah Hoyt, Mandy Joye, Salit Kark, Nélia C. Mestre, Anna Metaxas, Simone Pfeifer, Kerry Sink, Andrew K. Sweetman, Ursula Witte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 18% |
United States | 6 | 9% |
Canada | 5 | 7% |
South Africa | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 68% |
Scientists | 19 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 828 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 822 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 118 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 112 | 14% |
Researcher | 97 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 11% |
Other | 33 | 4% |
Other | 88 | 11% |
Unknown | 288 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 149 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 13% |
Engineering | 64 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 38 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 3% |
Other | 123 | 15% |
Unknown | 324 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#193,197
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#12
of 4,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,583
of 300,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.