You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Managing Rivers for Multiple Benefits–A Coherent Approach to Research, Policy and Planning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00004 |
| Authors |
David Tickner, Helen Parker, Catherine R. Moncrieff, Naomi E. M. Oates, Eva Ludi, Mike Acreman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 29% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Rwanda | 1 | 3% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 77% |
| Scientists | 6 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 47 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#987,500
of 23,559,085 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#80
of 3,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,052
of 423,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,559,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.