You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Artificial Light at Night Affects Organism Flux across Ecosystem Boundaries and Drives Community Structure in the Recipient Ecosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00061 |
| Authors |
Alessandro Manfrin, Gabriel Singer, Stefano Larsen, Nadine Weiß, Roy H. A. van Grunsven, Nina-Sophie Weiß, Stefanie Wohlfahrt, Michael T. Monaghan, Franz Hölker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 12% |
| Spain | 6 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 5 | 6% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 79% |
| Scientists | 14 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#233,772
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#20
of 4,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,856
of 338,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.