You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recognizing Patterns: Spatial Analysis of Observed Microbial Colonization on Root Surfaces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00061 |
| Authors |
Hannes Schmidt, Naoise Nunan, Alexander Höck, Thilo Eickhorst, Christina Kaiser, Dagmar Woebken, Xavier Raynaud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,318,122
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#206
of 3,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,880
of 326,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#8
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.