You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mobile Colloidal Organic Carbon: An Underestimated Carbon Pool in Global Carbon Cycles?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00148 |
| Authors |
Jing Yan, Ronald Manelski, Bruce Vasilas, Yan Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,816,675
of 23,788,679 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#488
of 3,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,686
of 440,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,788,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.