You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Use of Traditional and Modern Tools for Monitoring Wetlands Biodiversity in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00061 |
| Authors |
P. J. Stephenson, Yaa Ntiamoa-Baidu, John P. Simaika |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,457,821
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#217
of 3,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,566
of 398,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#9
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.