You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hydropeaking Operations of Two Run-of-River Mega-Dams Alter Downstream Hydrology of the Largest Amazon Tributary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00120 |
| Authors |
Rafael M. Almeida, Stephen K. Hamilton, Emma J. Rosi, Nathan Barros, Carolina R. C. Doria, Alexander S. Flecker, Ayan S. Fleischmann, Alexander J. Reisinger, Fábio Roland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Brazil | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 17% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,347,195
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#108
of 3,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,238
of 399,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#8
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.