You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Demonstration and Testing of the Improved Shelterbelt Component in the Holos Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00149 |
| Authors |
Roland Kröbel, Julius Moore, Yu Zhao Ni, Aaron McPherson, Laura Poppy, Raju Y. Soolanayakanahally, Beyhan Y. Amichev, Tricia Ward, Colin P. Laroque, Ken C. J. Van Rees, Fardausi Akhter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,110,869
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#606
of 3,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,260
of 401,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#26
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,699 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.