You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-term monitoring of fish in a freshwater reservoir: Different ways of weighting complex spatial samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1000087 |
| Authors |
Gashaw C. Tesfaye, Allan T. Souza, Daniel Bartoň, Petr Blabolil, Martin Čech, Vladislav Draštík, Jaroslava Frouzová, Michaela Holubová, Luboš Kočvara, Tomáš Kolařík, Carlos Martinez, Karlos R. Moraes, Milan Muška, Marie Prchalová, Milan Říha, Zuzana Sajdlová, Kateřina Soukalová, Marek Šmejkal, Michal Tušer, Mojmír Vašek, Lukáš Vejřík, Ivana Vejříková, Jiří Peterka, Tomáš Jůza, Jan Kubečka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,073,460
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,023
of 3,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,373
of 429,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#45
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,492 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.