↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED: An empirical investigation of the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth on climate change, evidence from emerging Asian countries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED: An empirical investigation of the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth on climate change, evidence from emerging Asian countries
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1085372
Authors

Jingyun Zhao, Taiming Zhang, Arshad Ali, Jian Chen, Houqi Ji, Tiantian Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 17 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 18%
Engineering 4 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Energy 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#19,662,401
of 24,180,797 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,552
of 4,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,564
of 438,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#62
of 420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,180,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.