↓ Skip to main content

Early warning analysis of mountain flood disaster based on Copula function risk combination

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early warning analysis of mountain flood disaster based on Copula function risk combination
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1324690
Authors

Qihui Chai, Fang Wan, Fei Zhang, Feng Wu, Wenhao Han, Zelin Ding, Shifeng Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#21,243,571
of 26,083,840 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,829
of 4,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,054
of 375,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#44
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,083,840 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.