You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carbon finance and funding for forest sector climate solutions: a review and synthesis of the principles, policies, and practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1309885 |
| Authors |
Kai Zhou, David Midkiff, Runsheng Yin, Han Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,872,701
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#444
of 4,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,140
of 182,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#18
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.