↓ Skip to main content

System effects mapping: a tool for promoting collaborative community ecological action

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
System effects mapping: a tool for promoting collaborative community ecological action
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1356065
Authors

Virginia Baker, Mat Walton, Suzanne Manning, Jamie Ataria, Carla Gee, Robin Taua-Gordon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,175,263
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,158
of 4,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,080
of 340,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#47
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.