↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Climate science, solutions and services for net zero, climate-resilient food systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Climate science, solutions and services for net zero, climate-resilient food systems
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1416427
Authors

Pete D. Falloon, Aled Jones, Siemen Van Berkum, Stefan Kepinski, Mike Rivington

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,934,104
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#302
of 4,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,373
of 156,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.