You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fine-scale foraging ecology of leatherback turtles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2015.00015 |
| Authors |
Bryan P. Wallace, Michael Zolkewitz, Michael C. James |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,048,871
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#369
of 5,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,853
of 261,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.