You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of multiple sources of social information in contest behavior: testing the social cognitive abilities of a cichlid fish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2015.00085 |
| Authors |
Takashi Hotta, Tomohiro Takeyama, Dik Heg, Satoshi Awata, Lyndon A. Jordan, Masanori Kohda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,247,012
of 24,162,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#427
of 4,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,398
of 268,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.